Implications for producers in MI: in the process of analyzing all final partitioning data for nutrient concentrations; row closure; environmental risk; dry down - stay green potential; branching low to ground.
Take home points: decreased seeding rates had no effect on total dry matter accum. and did not increase grain yield response to nutrient application (under dry conditions); response to nutrient applications - MESZ application (greater response at 123,500 vs 420,100 seeds ha and may not translate into grain yield depending on moisture; no effect of K2O on DM accum. or grain yield; early-season TDM ha increased with increased seeding rates and subsurface MESZ applications; promotes early-season development to capitalize on mid-season climatic variability. Economic return not significantly affected by changing seeding rates. Yield maximized at higher seeding rates but often sacrifice money for great yields.