Update:
Of the two planned field trials are planned for the collaborative N-fixation project being led by Ignacio Ciampitti and Seth Naeve, only 1 was planted due to wet field conditions and delayed planting. The Sutherland location was planted on May 19 and harvested on Sept 27. All field plant and soil samples were sent to Ignacio for nitrogen fixation analysis and Seth for grain composition. In brief, 2022 yields were depressed slightly from 2021. However, like 2021, the high N application did show a grain yield response that was not economical. From 2021 we saw that modest amounts of N and S did not significantly affect N fixation but the high N rate did reduce the amount of soybean fixed nitrogen.
New for 2022, we conducted a soybean biological seed treatment trial in Ames. We evaluated 7 different products. At the time of this report, the trial has not been harvested because of extremely late planting on June 27. UAV imagery did not detect treatment differences in canopy health or canopy closure.
In the soybean N fixation trial with 3 site-years (Ames and Sutherland in 2021; Sutherland in 2022), we found modest amounts of S and/or N did not improve soybean yield. S was applied at 30 #/acre and N was applied at 26 #/acre at the time of planting. However, the high rate (30 # S/acre and 300 # N/acre) did result in a positive yield response at both locations in 2021 and only a nominal yield response in 2022. Soybean yield levels was greater than 75 bu/ac at Sutherland in 2021 while Ames 2021 and Sutherland 2022 were both above 60 bu/ac. Regardless of the rate of yield level or yield response, it was not an economical response. However, the results indicate that a response to N and/or S is more likely at higher yield levels.