2016
Maximizing the cover crop potential of cereal rye before soybean through alternative termination timings and methods
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
GeneticsGenomicsSeed quality
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Erin Hill, Michigan State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
1607
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Effectively integrating cover crops into field crop rotations has been limited by Michigan’s brief growing season. The objectives of this research are to explore the possibility of terminating a cereal rye cover crop after soybean planting and to determine the best termination method for cereal rye. A field experiment has been initiated at the MSU Agronomy Farm in East Lansing, MI to look at terminating rye at 18”, 40”, and 60”, with soybean no-till drilled before or at the time of rye termination. Rye termination methods in this preliminary study include glyphosate application, mowing, and a combination of the two methods. Rye characteristics will be evaluated at the time of termination...

Unique Keywords:
#soil fertility
Information And Results
Project Deliverables

Recommendations for maximizing rye cover crop biomass and methods of termination for soybean production will be discussed at MSU Extension meetings in conjunction with the Cover Crop and Soil Health group. These recommendations will also be made available through covercrops.msu.edu and through the Midwest Cover Crop Council website (mccc.msu.edu, which had over 23,000 visits in 2015).

Final Project Results

Updated February 21, 2017:
Waiting 15 days (May 19 to June 3, Feeke’s 6.5 to 10.5) to terminate the cereal rye cover crop nearly tripled the dry biomass production from 774 to 2,041 lbs/A. The earlier soybean planting time (May 19, rye at Feeke’s 6.5) coupled with rye termination at the same time resulted in advanced soybean maturity and leaf area early in the season (June 22, average V2.8 and 94 cm2) compared to when no cover crop was utilized (same soybean planting time, V2.5 and 81 cm2) despite there being no differences in soil temperature and moisture and soybean and weed emergence at the time. The later soybean planting time (May 23, rye at Feeke’s 9) coupled with delayed rye termination time (June 3, Feeke’s 10.5) reduced the seasonal total weed emergence (average 100 weeds/m2) compared to when no cover crop was utilized (either planting time, average 250 weeds/m2). Soybean emergence, growth rate, and leaf area were also reduced in these treatments, however soybean nutrient content and yields (Figure 1) were not different.

Conclusions from Year 1:
• Planting green showed the potential to reduce weed emergence without reducing soybean yields
• In 2016 no insect related issues related to planting green were detected
• In a year with increased moisture during the early soybean growing season results may differ
• Mowed only treatments often needed a later application of glyphosate to complete rye termination
• No differences were detected among termination methods at these rye biomass levels

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.