2021
Efficacy of Herbicides, Timing, and Tank Mixes on Novel Herbicide Tolerant Traits in MD Soybean Systems
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
AgricultureCrop protectionHerbicide
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Benjamin Beale, University of Maryland
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
21063227
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth, common ragweed, common waterhemp and marestail continue to pose significant challenges to Maryland producers. Farmers are adopting new herbicide trait technology as another tool for managing herbicide resistance. This study continues previous work examining various combinations of pre-post herbicide using the new herbicide tolerance technology and their effect on weed species commonly encountered. Trials evaluate efficacy of currently available herbicides used in soybean tolerant trait platforms for control of Palmer amaranth, fall panicum and other weeds, antagonism or synergistic effects of herbicide combinations on Palmer amaranth and post-emergence efficacy at multiple weed growth stages.

Key Benefactors:
farmers, agronomists, Extension agents

Information And Results
Project Deliverables

Education regarding weed identification and management strategies continues to be important to enable early intervention; thus funding is also requested to carry out field days and include weed resistance topics in winter production meetings. With many problematic weeds now found throughout the state it is essential that farmers learn the key management strategies to control these weeds. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the workshops were moved to an online Zoom platform. The workshops were offered in collaboration with University of Delaware and Virginia Tech. These workshops were well received, reaching 270 participants over two days. We propose to continue our educational
outreach efforts through another series of all day workshops and field day events focused on proactive and integrated management strategies to avoid future cases of herbicide resistance and current recommendations for current cases of resistance. The workshops would continue to build upon our collaborative approach.

Final Project Results

Update:

View uploaded report PDF file

View uploaded report 2 PDF file

Herbicide trials evaluating the efficacy of various combinations of post emergent contact and systemic herbicides was conducted during the 2021 growing season to evaluate control of palmer amaranth. This is the second year of the research study. The selected site was part of an 8 acre field primarily with Sassafras soils with a heavy infestation of glyphosate and ALS resistant palmer amaranth the preceding crop year. A plot design consisting of both Enlist and Xtendflex soybean varieties was used to evaluate herbicide performance across an early and late treatment. The following 17 treatment protocols were evaluated:

1 Control
2 Roundup
3 Liberty + AMS
4 Roundup + Liberty + AMS
5 Enlist One
6 Roundup + Enlist One
7 Roundup + Liberty + Enlist One + AMS
8 Liberty + Enlist One + AMS
9 Xtendimax + Drift Guard
10 Roundup + Xtendimax + DRA + VRA
11 Roundup + Xtendimax + Liberty + Drift Guard
12 Xtendimax + Liberty + Drift Guard
13 Select Max + NIS + AMS
14 Select Max + Xtendimax + Drift Guard
15 Enlist One + Select Maxx + NIS
16 Liberty + Select + AMS + NIS
17 Enlist One + Liberty + Select + AMS + NIS

Soybeans were planted on June 24 with Pioneer P45T88 Enlist E3 and Asgrow AG47XFO Xtendflex variety soybeans utilizing a complete randomized block split plot design. All plots received a burn down/residual treatment prior to soybean emergence. Treatment consisted of Dual Magnum at 1 pint per acre; Gramoxone SL 3.0 at 2 pints per acre and Roundup Powermax at 1 quart per acre. Plots were then split, with one half of the plots receiving an application of the post emergence treatments applied 22 days after burndown application (On-time or early treatment) and the other half of the plots receiving a postemergence application 46 days after initial burndown (non-timely or late treatment). Palmer amaranth plants were emerged and present across all plots with an average height of 4 inches at the time of the on-time or early application. Palmer amaranth plants had an average height of 24-30 inches at the time of the late or non-timely applciation. Treatments were rated for percent control of Palmer Amaranth at 23, 32 and 60 days after postemergence application.

Results indicate that most tank-mix combinations tested provided adequate control of emerged Palmer amaranth, with no apparent antagonism. The treatment of Select Max + Enlist One resulted in significantly less control at 22 days after treatment. As expected, treatments with Roundup, Select Max and the control treatments had little to no control of Palmer amaranth. Additionally, the treatments applied late did not perform as well as the early treatment. This study confirms the importance of timely postemergence applications when Palmer amaranth weeds are still less than 4-6 inches in height.

A separate trial at the same location was conducted to evaluate herbicide treatment protocols for grass control. Stands of fall panicum and barnyard grass were present in the test plots. Herbicide performance was evaluated at three time intervals. The plot size was 5 feet wide by 10 feet long. Pioneer P45T88 Enlist E3 were planted on June 24. Postemergence treatments were applied to all plots on July 23. . Barnyardgrass and fall panicum were primary species present. Grass was an average height of 15-20 inches in height. Control percentage was rated from 0-100 on August 4 and August 9 with non-treated control plots and non-treated running checks along each plot being used as a reference point for 0% control.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.