2017
Increasing Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness in Intensively Managed Soybean
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Checkoff reputationCommercializationEarned mediaEnd usersIndustry outreach
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Jim Long, FAM Enterprises, Inc.
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
17FAM
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Objectives of this research project include screening genotypes under high-yield versus low-yield environments to determine best adapted genotypes and rating varieties for charcoal rot and yield characteristics and components; using integrated pest management, scouting and predictive models to refine guidelines for fungicides and insecticides in intensive production; intensify research into auxin use to develop greater root development in high yielding soybeans; refining nitrogen use in soybean under irrigation; exploring the use of novel compounds like sugar and aspirin to determine if there is an effect; incorporating new effectiveness in complete treatment packages.

Key Benefactors:
farmers, agronomists, extension specialists, ag retailers

Information And Results
Project Deliverables

Objective 1: This is a result of previous research to determine best methods of identifying genetic potential under both irrigated and non-irrigated production. Replicated field work will be in the 1st year to evaluate differences in genetic potential of soybean varieties under both irrigated and non-irrigated studies. Limited research trials have shown that some varieties have responded to whole plant health / intensive management while others have not. This study will be conducted to determine the best method of field testing. Do we include both a high and low yield section of each plot in the same trial, different plots of high and low yield within the same trial, or separated trials of both high and low yield with the same varieties. Second while we still do not know if this response is a result of physiology of the plant, growth habit (i.e. determinate vs. indeterminate), or a difference in response at growth stages (i.e. vegetative or reproductive stages) we now know that we can separate varieties by assessing their yield potential under both aggressive high yield and passive low yield environments. Another aspect of this objective will be to work with industry to develop novel or more useful field assessment methods of treatments on plant stand, plant growth and development, and yield component testing. All data will be run through statistical programs to determine differences and information will be made available to the public through all available media. Greenhouse and field evaluation of varieties will be conducted. The objective will be to determine if there are genetic differences that affect final grain yield which can be exploited by producers and industry. Samples will be taken throughout the life of the soybean, especially during late vegetative and early reproductive growth stages to determine genetic effects on early growth, yield components such as number of pods, and then final yield. All data will be run through statistical programs to determine differences and information will be made available to the public through all available media.

Objective 2: Replicated field work has indicated that older low-cost products can be used effectively to help control diseases such as charcoal rot and soybean pod worm. However, a question that continues to come up is one of need of fungicides and insecticides if pests may not be present at each growth stage. This research will indicate if BMPs need to include scouting or predictive models to determine need of pest control. One part of this research is the early warning of impending problems and will include predictive models, scouting of the crop, insect trapping, and use of sentinel plots of susceptible or untreated controls to determine pest presence. The idea is to increase the efficiency and contribute to BMP’s for using fungicides and insecticides in intensive management of soybean. This research will enable us to develop BMPs that are built on sound agronomic and economic practices. All data will be run through statistical programs to determine differences and information will be made available to the public through all available media.

Objective 3: Recent research has indicated that the plant growth hormone auxin or auxin like compounds have the greatest potential for producers to achieve high yield soybeans. This research will look at this in both irrigated and non-irrigated studies and hopefully under drought stress where its usefulness in helping to develop more root mass can increase grain yield. Another aspect would be the use of products that stimulate protective responses within the plant that alter their physiology and make them more disease resistant. All data will be run through statistical programs to determine differences and information will be made available to the public through all available media.

Objective 4: Replicated field work will be initiated to determine best rates of nitrogen to use under both irrigated and non-irrigated soybean production. It will in part be a calibration study as well as look at agronomic characteristics such as lodging, plant height, and yield components. N effect on charcoal rot will also be evaluated.

Objective 5. Replicated field work with simple spray additives like sugar and aspirin will be initiated to evaluate their effect on fungicide efficacy and overall health of the plant including growth and disease incidence and severity. Current studies were initiated during the last commission project and are not finished. In addition trials will be taken to yield and yield components will be determined. All data will be run through statistical programs to determine differences and information will be made available to the public through all available media.

Objective 6. New products hit the market each year and older compounds go off patent and are sold as generic. This study would determine what is available new to the market and provide useful data to determine their or similar products effectiveness and cost. All data will be run through statistical programs to determine differences and information will be made available to the public through all available media.

Objective 7. Information delivery has always been dependent on graphs and data slides. I propose to look at 3D visuals to show treatment effects in a 3D visual format.

Final Project Results

Update:
SEE UPLOADED FILE BELOW COMPLETE WITH PICTURES AND GRAPHS
A report of activity during the first year of the project ending February 28, 2018.

Objective 1. Screening for Genetic potential
Varieties with varying response to charcoal rot were compared to determine their potential under both conventional (check) and intensive management. In addition 4 selections from Bill Schapaughs program were compared also. Results for 2017 indicate that entries with some tolerance to charcoal rot will perform well under intensive management.

Objective 2. BMP’s
A second study to develop best management practices for predicting disease and insect problems and need for crop monitoring or treatment has been set up with insect traps and sentinel plots established in the field. Black light and sticky traps started picking up large numbers of Japanese beetle and soybean pod worm by June 17th. This was confirmed by field scouts especially in corn fields as well as soybean. This also includes weather data from time of planting to determine the effect of weather fronts, temperature and rainfall on insect and disease infestation in the soybean crop. Sentinel fields and plots were also established in 2017 and were scouted for both diseases and insects. In addition to the insects picked up through scouting and traps soybean diseases such as septoria and frogeye leafspot were picked up by mid-season. Insect control is one of the major needs in IPM of intensively managed soybean. There were certainly both insect and disease problems in 2017.

Objective 3. PGR use on soybean
Another study was planted and treatments were applied to compare PGR use on soybean to enhance soybean growth and yield especially early in the season. Auxin or auxin like compounds were utilized to determine their effect on growth and yield. PGR had little effect on yield in 2017 although there are possible trends to increase root mass.

Objective 4. Nitrogen Rates in High Yield Dryland and Irrigated Soybean
As a part of the previous objectives study Nitrogen rates and times of application will be utilized throughout the growing season. Their effect on grain yield and quality as well as the agronomic characteristics such as lodging have been followed throughout the year. Some N rates have caused lodging of plants. Other plots receiving less N have not lodged.

Objective 5. Novel compounds
Treatments were compared in 2017 to compare novels compounds like sugar added to spray components to determine if there is an effect and what that effect might be.

Objective 6. Incorporation of Generic Compounds into a Cost Effective Package.
Plots were planted that compare untreated checks with generic and standard treatments. Comparisons of treatments will include critical stages of growth as well as specific insect and disease occurrence. Cost of treatment as well as effectiveness of treatments will be determined. Since there is a lot of information this will be the topic for a poster at the Soybean Expo in January. Generally, generic treatments do an adequate job under intensive management but new products such as Trivapro or Priaxor have better canopy management of disease.

Objective 7. 3D visuals for information delivery
Literature review and product evaluation have begun. This will pick up as information becomes available and audiences are identified. The development of and use of existing programs for data presentation will begin with first year results. The ultimate goal is to show season long effect of treatments on growth, disease development and insect infestation.

View uploaded report Word file

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.