2015
Engineered resistance to soybean cyst nematode via induced gene silencing (RNAi)
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
NematodePest
Lead Principal Investigator:
Harold Trick, Kansas State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Tim C. Todd, Kansas State University
John Finer, The Ohio State University
Wayne Parrott, University of Georgia
Lila Vodkin, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
+3 More
Project Code:
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) continues to be the top biotic stress causing losses in excess of 100 million bushels annually. Incorporation of natural genetic resistance has been only partially effective because it is apparent that the variations within the nematode populations adapt to the new cultivars and overcome resistance genes within a few years. The primary goal of this research project is to establish a new set of biotech traits that have durable resistance to soybean cyst nematode (SCN).

Turning off genes by a process known as RNA interference (RNAi) has tremendous potential as a new strategy to increase nematode resistance. Past research with other nematode species has demonstrated...

Unique Keywords:
#nematodes, #soybean biotechnology, #soybean cyst nematode - genetic resistance, #soybean genetic engineering, #virus induced gene silencing (vigs)
Information And Results
Project Deliverables

We have performed SCN bioassays on 45 transgenic lines representing six different target nematode genes, Based on preliminary bioassays we have and identified 18 lines for further analyses. We have performed RNAseq data on a few of these lines and demonstrated that at least two lines of one gene (Y25) and one line of a second gene (Prp17) show an elevated levels of siRNA molecules correlating to an increased level toe SNC resistance.

Final Project Results

The SCN bioassay for transgenic lines Y25 E12P2 and J23 E4P1 were conducted for resistance evaluation. Both lines were germinated from T1 seeds. It was accordance with initial screening assay that Y25 E12 P2 and J23 E4P1 were able to reduce the SCN egg population by 55.9% and 44.8%, respectively, compared to non-transgenic controls, cultivar JackX.

Using established RT-qPCR system for the quantitation of transgene expression combined with previous bioassay data, several T1 transgenic lines were selected for offspring seed production.

The plant tissue from SCN bioassays were shipped to UICU for RNA-seq. With the analyses of two bioassays of Y25 and Prp17 genes performed, it indicated that soybean dicer-like (DCL) was able to cleave H. glycines genes’ dsRNAs into 19 to 23 nucleotides (nt) with similar patterns as endogenous siRNA. The analyses also showed that the predominant size of siRNAs was 21-nt, the same as the dominant size of endogenous siRNA sequences of soybean reported in the literature, demonstrating that the cleaving mechanism of soybean DCL was likely the same for endogenous genes and exogenous genes. It was another evidence that host derived RNAi technique to silence nematodes worked in soybean plants.

From RNAseq data, the distribution of target siRNA in different T1 plants was following similar patterns. Compared with patterns of different generations of our transgenic soybeans, the T2 generation of Prp17 had much more unified patterns than T1 generation as well as the Y25 T1 generation. It was consistent with the phenomenon observed that the resistant ability was more fluctuated in T1 generation. Most importantly, based on our results of sequencing and bioassays, it was likely that the expression of small RNA levels were correlated to resistant ability. The resistance ability seems obtained when siRNA reached to about 200 target RPM, and in general, it strongly suggested that the higher target RPM, the higher SCN reduction in the transgenic soybean plant.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.