2024
Quantification and Mitigation of Trypsin Inhibitors in Soybean Meal
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Feed
Keywords:
Animal nutritionAnti-nutritional factors
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Bo Zhang, Virginia Tech
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
24-107-D-B-1-C
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
$170,144
Brief Project Summary:
Stakeholders have identified the urgent need to quantify and mitigate TI in soybean meals for the value-added meal industry. Our long-term goal is to improve seed quality attributes for meal markets using new and improved soybean varieties that bolster the economic capabilities of producers. Our overall objective is to develop soybean varieties and germplasm with nutritional bundles such as low TIs and high protein digestibility. The specific objectives are to (1) develop NIR calibrations of TI content and activity using Near Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy analyzers other than Perten NIR; (2) optimize toasting temperature to process high-quality meal using lines with different ratios of KTI and BBTI; (3) Identify major BBTI and lectin gene(s) underlining TI and anti-nutritional activities; and (4) develop protocols to quantify lectin content and activity. Our expected outcomes include 1) fast and reliable NIR quantification methods for both KTI and BBTI, 2) recommended low toasting temperature for soybean meal preparation using low-TI soybean to reduce energy consumption and improve protein digestibility by animal proteases, 3) BBTI genome editing constructs for knockout the BBTI ge
Information And Results
Project Summary

Project Objectives

Project Deliverables

Progress Of Work

Final Project Results

1. Trypsin Inhibitors Quantification: In this phase, 300 soybean samples from the Southern Core Collection (SCC) were analyzed for Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (KTI) and Bowman-Birk trypsin inhibitor (BBTI) concentrations. KTI concentration ranged from 0.492 to 7.675 mg/g in seeds and 0.240 to 10.756 mg/g in soybean meals, while BBTI concentrations ranged from 0.338 to 7.788 mg/g in seeds and 0.0 to 4.275 mg/g in meals. A robust NIR calibration model was developed to predict KTI and total TI concentrations using the spectral data, with an R-squared value of 0.96. This model has significant implications for improving the speed and accuracy of TI quantification in the soybean industry. 2. Protein Digestibility and Temperature Treatments: A custom-designed steam toasting system was applied to soybean meals at different temperatures (60°C, 80°C, 100°C, and 121°C). Protein digestibility improved with increasing temperature, reaching optimal levels at 100°C and 121°C. At these temperatures, the trypsin binding activity of KTI was significantly reduced. The protein solubility decreased as the temperature increased, likely due to protein aggregation at higher temperatures. SDS-PAGE analysis confirmed reduced protein complexity at 100°C and 121°C, supporting the conclusion that thermal processing effectively reduces antinutritional factors while maintaining protein integrity. 3. Gene Editing for Trypsin Inhibitor Reduction: In the most groundbreaking part of the project, researchers successfully utilized CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to target BBTI genes responsible for trypsin inhibitor production in soybean. A comprehensive genome sequence analysis led to the identification of seven candidate BBTI genes for editing, which include Glyma09g28720, Glyma09g28700, and Glyma09g28730. These genes are highly expressed in soybean seeds and are prime targets for reducing trypsin inhibitor content through genome modification. Researchers developed three guide RNAs to specifically target these nine BBTI genes, allowing for precise gene knockouts. The editing construct (p3399-BBTI-3gRNAs) was successfully transformed into the soybean cultivar Jack using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Additionally, an Agrobacterium strain carrying a Ruby reporter gene was employed to monitor transformation efficiency, with successful transformation evidenced by the appearance of reddish spots on the cotyledonary nodes. Over 23 putative transgenic soybean seedlings were identified, which will be further validated through genotyping to confirm successful BBTI knockout. In addition, this report includes a detailed expression analysis of the lectin genes, another antinutritional factor in soybeans. Six candidate lectin genes were identified through BLAST analysis and qPCR validation, with varying levels of expression across different tissues. These genes could also be targeted for future genome editing to reduce lectin content. 4. Lectin Measurement and Its Correlation with TI: An optimized high-throughput HPLC protocol was established to measure lectin content in soybean seeds and meals, with concentrations ranging from 1.16 to 12.46 mg/g. Six soybean lines were identified that exhibit both low lectin and low KTI content, which are ideal candidates for breeding programs aimed at reducing antinutritional factors. Importantly, no correlation was observed between the activity or concentration of TIs and lectin activity, suggesting that these two factors can be addressed independently. The comprehensive research presented in this report highlights significant progress in the mitigation of trypsin inhibitors and other antinutritional factors through innovative genome editing techniques, thermal processing, and high-throughput phenotyping. These advancements lay the groundwork for future improvements in soybean meal quality, with a strong potential for publication in high-impact journals such as Crop Science.

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

The report highlights several key benefits for U.S. farmers, particularly in the context of animal feed: 1. Improved Protein Digestibility for Animals: One of the primary benefits is the significant improvement in protein digestibility in soybean meal when processed at specific temperatures, such as 100°C. Increased digestibility means animals, especially livestock like poultry and swine, can absorb more nutrients from the feed. This enhances growth rates, overall health, and productivity, ensuring better feed conversion and efficiency. 2. Reduction of Anti-Nutritional Factors: The report highlights the reduction of trypsin inhibitors (TIs) in soybean meal, which are compounds that hinder animals' ability to digest proteins effectively. By reducing these inhibitors through optimized processing and genetic improvements, the soybean meal becomes more beneficial for animals. This means less feed is wasted, and animals can make better use of the protein content, leading to enhanced growth and development. 3. Benefits to U.S. Farmers: A- Cost Efficiency: Improved digestibility and reduced anti-nutritional factors mean that farmers can achieve more efficient feed utilization, which translates into reduced feed costs. Livestock will require less feed to meet their nutritional needs, saving farmers money on animal feed. B- Higher Yields from Soybean Crops: By utilizing advanced techniques like near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and genome editing, farmers can grow soybean varieties optimized for animal feed. These varieties have lower levels of anti-nutritional factors, making them more marketable and beneficial for animal nutrition, potentially commanding higher prices in the market. C- Sustainable Farming Practices: By producing soybean meals that animals can digest more efficiently, farmers contribute to more sustainable farming practices. Animals need less feed to meet their growth requirements, reducing the overall feed demand and decreasing the environmental footprint of farming operations. In summary, these innovations in soybean meal processing and genetics benefit both U.S. farmers by lowering costs and improving crop value, and animals by enhancing protein digestibility, promoting better growth, and overall health.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.