Updated January 30, 2025:
In previous years of this study, foliar fungicide applications with the selected products tested provided some benefit related to improved seed quality and yield in situations where FLS disease pressure was present at measurable levels (2018-2019). Fungicides also significantly increased plant greenness and delayed senescence in all years tested. During the 2024 growing season, none of the treatments tested yielded significantly different than the non-treated control. This is likely due to the fact that no ratable foliar fungal diseases were present in the plots this year. Without the presence of a pathogen, fungicides have reduced odds of improving yields over non-treated plots. To date, no fungal resistance to fungicide active ingredients have been detected in these plots.
View uploaded report 
Fungicide trials have been conducted annually since 2018. In two years of the study (2018 and 2019), a fungicide application provided a significant yield advantage over the non-treated control. These were two years where heavy disease pressure from Frogeye Leaf Spot (FLS) was observed. In all other site years, no single treatment was any better or worse than the non-treated control. When economic data was analyzed by fungicide application timing (no fungicide, one application at R3, or two applications at R3 and 14 days later), the two application treatment was the least profitable, losing $22 per acre on average. A single application at R3 was statistically similar to no application. This suggests that if growers are considering a fungicide application to soybeans, a single application at R3 or no application at all, is likely to be the most profitable. Heavy FLS infections in two years, which significantly reduced yields, highlight the importance of scouting to inform decisions about fungicide applications.