2024
Improving Herbicide Resistant Weed Management in Maryland Soybean
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Field management Herbicide
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Kurt Vollmer, University of Maryland
Co-Principal Investigators:
Project Code:
24063095
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:
This proposal was developed based on the priorities for production research and herbicide resistant weed management outlined by the MSB in their request for proposals as well as conversations with soybean farmers and ag businesses. These objectives will expand on work previously funded by the Maryland Soybean board evaluating optimal timing/herbicide choice as well as mechanical methods for effective weed control.
Key Beneficiaries:
#farmers
Unique Keywords:
#herbicideresistance, #weedmanagement
Information And Results
Project Summary

Herbicide-resistant weeds continue to drive weed management decisions. There are currently 131 unique cases of herbicide resistance in the United States with 13 different herbicide-resistant weeds in Maryland (Heap 2023). Furthermore, there has been a 40% increase in the last decade in the number of weed species resistant to at least 2 herbicide sites-of-action (Heap 2023). In Maryland these include Palmer amaranth and common ragweed.

Previous studies funded by the Maryland soybean board demonstrated several pre- and postemergence options for controlling these resistant weeds (Vollmer et al 2022; Beale and Leslie 2022). Conversely, future management practices should aim to abate further resistance development in order to preserve effective herbicides. Tank mixing herbicides with different sites-of-action is one way to assuage the onset of herbicide resistance. This is due to a weed population having a lower probability of developing resistance to two or more sites-of-action, but there is a caveat. Both herbicides used must 1) target different sites-of-action, 2) must be effective alone, and 3) must target the same life stage of the weed. Previous research funded by the Maryland Soybean Board has shown 2,4-D plus glufosinate to be an effective treatment for managing emerged herbicide-resistant common ragweed and Palmer amaranth, but these herbicides do not provide residual weed control (Figure 1). An effective postemergence with residual program is necessary for full-season control of weeds like Palmer amaranth. However, growers may forego a residual herbicide at the time of the postemergence application or may rely on a single site-of-action for residual control. Including herbicides with both foliar and residual activity, such as fomesafen (Reflex), in tank mixtures with other effective foliar and residual herbicides may help to preserve the utility of existing herbicides in Maryland soybean production.

In addition, there is little data from Maryland studies about the efficacy of OMRI approved herbicides and herbicide tank mixtures for control in organic soybean. These herbicides act on contact, similar to glufosinate, causing rapid cell desiccation. However, it is not recommended that they be applied over-the-top of emerged soybeans and effectively incorporating them into a postemergence weed control program can be challenging.

Project Objectives

1) demonstrate the efficacy of herbicide tank mixtures for herbicide resistance mitigation,
2) evaluate the efficacy of early and late postemergence applications for full season weed control,
3) evaluate treatment effects on seed viability and the potential for resistance development.

Project Deliverables

The study will compare early-postemergence (2 to 3 weeks after planting, WAP) and postemergence (4-6 WAP) treatments (Table 1). All herbicide treatments will compare the efficacy of single products to tank mixtures in controlling emerged weeds and extending residual weed control. A flame weeding treatment will also be included to evaluate a non-chemical
option. Treatments will be evaluated for weed control 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment and at harvest. To assess the effects of these treatments on overall seed production, weed density will be recorded and seed from surviving plants of selected species will be collected prior to harvest and germination tests performed to determine overall seed viability.

Progress Of Work

Updated August 1, 2024:
Two field studies were established in June of 2024 at the University of Maryland Wye Research and Education Center in Queenstown, MD and a grower field in Sudlersville, MD. A residual herbicide application was made prior to planting Enlist E3 soybeans at both locations. Postemergence applications were made at the Wye location on June 20 and July 3. Although the Sudlersville location was evaluated weekly for weed emergence, weed pressure was insufficient to conduct an adequate evaluation. Therefore, the study was abandoned once soybeans canopied. Results from the Wye location were presented at the Maryland Weed Management Twilight Tour on June 26 and the Maryland Commodity Classic on July 25.

View uploaded report PDF file

Final Project Results

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

This research will benefit Maryland soybean growers and the soybean industry by expanding knowledge of potential strategies to help control these species prior to seed set. This project will address weed control in terms of effectiveness, resistance management, as well as its adaptability to Maryland’s specific needs.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.