This project will summarize a key set of published studies that demonstrate insects, especially pollinators can be conserved within and adjacent to crop fields (include soybean) using insecticides. This information can assist key stakeholders address the need to conserve endangered species that occur in regions where soybean production is common.
Pollinators, like the Rusty Patch Bumble bee, are found in Iowa and have been listed as endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) response to the endangered species act (ESA) may affect soybean farmers who use insecticides and are trying to practice conservation in and around their fields. Iowa leads the nation in employing conservation practices that can benefit pollinators, including those supported by the USDA’s conservation reserve program. For example, Iowa has more acres in CP42 (pollinator habitat) than any other state. Iowa is also the birthplace of the prairie strip practice (CP43), which can increase the diversity and abundance of pollinators, especially bees. These are voluntary practices that farmers must choose to do. If restrictions are placed on insecticide use because of the proximity of these practices to crop fields, farmers may elect to stop participating in CP42, CP43 and other practices that could conserve pollinators. How we proceed in practicing agriculture and conserving species requires empirical evidence from Iowa, if Iowans are to contribute significantly to this issue.

During the 8-month period, a team of researchers will compile work conducted in Iowa and the surrounding Midwestern states, that can inform if and to what extent conservation and insecticide use can co-occur on the same farm.
Research conducted in Iowa has shown that CP43 can conserve pollinators even when the adjacent soybean or corn field is using insecticides. This work has been compiled in several articles in the last 5 years. Similar work has been done in other states for CP42 and other conservation practices.
We will compile these studies and summarize them considering the initial proposals by the EPA to respond to the demands of the ESA. This includes a discussion “PULAs” (pesticide use limitation areas) and “pick lists” that may allow farmers to consider conservation practices when selecting and using pesticides.
We anticipate at least one article for a peer-reviewed journal that targets an audience interested in conservation and agriculture. A similar article has been written by colleagues on the topic of Monarch butterfly conservation and published in the journal Bioscience (Grant et al. 2022). We will use this as a model for constructing a summary of this broader topic.
In addition, our project team will create a 3-4 page handout that summarizes the key findings of this review. This will include a summary of the main issue (how the EPA is responding to its responsibilities to the Endangered Species Act) with key terms defined, like what it means for a species to be listed as endangered and what constitutes ‘critical habitat’ under the ESA. This document will be shared with extension personnel in both Iowa and Illinois and made public through the Extension Store at ISU.

The main article will be written and submitted for review by October 2024. We anticipate a 1-2 month review period, We have made progress on researching this article and beginning plans for its completion.

Updated June 25, 2024:
At this stage, we have started to accumulate references and identify what will go into our manuscript. We have a very strong draft based on our previous experience in the field and are making plans now to better frame it to fit the goals of this project.

Will inform practices related to pollinator and endangered species protection and regulation.