2024
What do we know about conserving insects in cropfields while still using insecticides: preparing for the EPA's response to the ESA
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
SustainabilityU.S. Soy reputation
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Adam Dolezal, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Co-Principal Investigators:
Matthew O'Neal, Iowa State University
Lisa Schulte Moore, Iowa State University
Amy Toth, Iowa State University
+2 More
Project Code:
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:
This project will summarize a key set of published studies that demonstrate insects, especially pollinators can be conserved within and adjacent to crop fields (include soybean) using insecticides. This information can assist key stakeholders address the need to conserve endangered species that occur in regions where soybean production is common.
Pollinators, like the Rusty Patch Bumble bee, are found in Iowa and have been listed as endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) response to the endangered species act (ESA) may affect soybean farmers who use insecticides and are trying to practice conservation in and around their fields. Iowa...
Information And Results
Project Summary

This project will summarize a key set of published studies that demonstrate insects, especially pollinators can be conserved within and adjacent to crop fields (include soybean) using insecticides. This information can assist key stakeholders address the need to conserve endangered species that occur in regions where soybean production is common.
Pollinators, like the Rusty Patch Bumble bee, are found in Iowa and have been listed as endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) response to the endangered species act (ESA) may affect soybean farmers who use insecticides and are trying to practice conservation in and around their fields. Iowa leads the nation in employing conservation practices that can benefit pollinators, including those supported by the USDA’s conservation reserve program. For example, Iowa has more acres in CP42 (pollinator habitat) than any other state. Iowa is also the birthplace of the prairie strip practice (CP43), which can increase the diversity and abundance of pollinators, especially bees. These are voluntary practices that farmers must choose to do. If restrictions are placed on insecticide use because of the proximity of these practices to crop fields, farmers may elect to stop participating in CP42, CP43 and other practices that could conserve pollinators. How we proceed in practicing agriculture and conserving species requires empirical evidence from Iowa, if Iowans are to contribute significantly to this issue.

Project Objectives


During the 8-month period, a team of researchers will compile work conducted in Iowa and the surrounding Midwestern states, that can inform if and to what extent conservation and insecticide use can co-occur on the same farm.
Research conducted in Iowa has shown that CP43 can conserve pollinators even when the adjacent soybean or corn field is using insecticides. This work has been compiled in several articles in the last 5 years. Similar work has been done in other states for CP42 and other conservation practices.
We will compile these studies and summarize them considering the initial proposals by the EPA to respond to the demands of the ESA. This includes a discussion “PULAs” (pesticide use limitation areas) and “pick lists” that may allow farmers to consider conservation practices when selecting and using pesticides.
We anticipate at least one article for a peer-reviewed journal that targets an audience interested in conservation and agriculture. A similar article has been written by colleagues on the topic of Monarch butterfly conservation and published in the journal Bioscience (Grant et al. 2022). We will use this as a model for constructing a summary of this broader topic.
In addition, our project team will create a 3-4 page handout that summarizes the key findings of this review. This will include a summary of the main issue (how the EPA is responding to its responsibilities to the Endangered Species Act) with key terms defined, like what it means for a species to be listed as endangered and what constitutes ‘critical habitat’ under the ESA. This document will be shared with extension personnel in both Iowa and Illinois and made public through the Extension Store at ISU.

Project Deliverables

The main article will be written and submitted for review by October 2024. We anticipate a 1-2 month review period, We have made progress on researching this article and beginning plans for its completion.

Progress Of Work

Updated June 25, 2024:
At this stage, we have started to accumulate references and identify what will go into our manuscript. We have a very strong draft based on our previous experience in the field and are making plans now to better frame it to fit the goals of this project.

Updated October 28, 2024:
We have started assembling the manuscript described in the proposal, with the research team meeting biweekly to move the project forward. In addition to assembling the published scientific research, we have also sought information from regulatory literature, including the student supported on this work directly interfacing with regulatory agencies to better understand the future of pesticide regulation and relate it to the published scientific literature.

Final Project Results

Benefit To Soybean Farmers

Will inform practices related to pollinator and endangered species protection and regulation.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.