Updated January 31, 2025:
Uniform soybean foliar fungicide field trials were conducted in nineteen different states (data from two projects were combined, where 11 states participating as collaborators in this project, and 8 states participating through a different regional project), in which eleven treatments and a nontreated check were evaluated. Primary disease pressure came from frogeye leaf spot (FLS; caused by Cercospora sojina) and Septoria brown spot (SBS; caused by Septoria glycines). Averaged across all locations, all fungicide treatments significantly reduced frogeye leaf spot severity compared to the nontreated control, where Revytek fungicide provided the greatest FLS reduction, but was not different than all other fungicide treatments except Trivapro and Quadris. For SBS management, only Miravis Neo and the three-way mixture of Echo + Folicur + Topsin were significantly different than the nontreated control. Averaged across all locations, only plots treated with Veltyma fungicide resulted in a significantly greater yield than the nontreated control. The data from the uniform fungicide trial were used to help revise the 2025 edition of the Crop Protection Network Soybean Foliar Fungicide Efficacy Guide. In addition, the data from these trials are being used to test, adjust, and optimize disease prediction models
Spore traps were deployed in soybean fields across eleven different states. Spore samples were collected at two different heights weekly. The samples were sent in bulk to the Smith Laboratory (University of Wisconsin), where DNA currently is being extracted from the 2024 spore samples. For the spore samples collected in 2023, all DNA have been extracted and the Smith Lab and Thomas-Sharma Lab (LSU) are enumerating spores of Cercospora sojina (FLS pathogen) and the species of Cercospora that cause Cercospora leaf blight. The Thomas-Sharma Lab also is developing a molecular assay to enumerate spores of the target spot pathogen (Corynespora cassiicola).
The Smith Lab continues to optimize and validate the “Frogpsotter” app that is used to forecast the risk of frogeye leaf spot A beta version of the app was made available for the 2024 growing season, and a protocol was developed to validate the risk model and evaluate spray thresholds on disease and yield. At several locations, fungicide treatments were applied at different timings based on either growth stage (R3, beginning pod) or a FLS risk threshold of 40%, 50%, and 60% if that risk occurred between R3 to R5. Weekly disease data and yield data were collected across all locations, and currently are being analyzed. The model currently uses a 21-day average of maximum air temperature and 10-day average of total daily hours with max relative humidity > 75% (wetting variable), and daily risk indices are calculated in the tool. The disease data collected from field trials are currently being used to retrain the model, and further field validation will occur during the 2025 growing season.
View uploaded report 
Uniform soybean foliar fungicide field trials were conducted in nineteen different states (data from two projects were combined, where 11 states participating as collaborators in this project, and 8 states participating through a different regional project), in which eleven treatments and a nontreated check were evaluated. Primary disease pressure came from frogeye leaf spot (FLS; caused by Cercospora sojina) and Septoria brown spot (SBS; caused by Septoria glycines). Averaged across all locations, all fungicide treatments significantly reduced frogeye leaf spot severity compared to the nontreated control, where Revytek fungicide provided the greatest FLS reduction, but was not different than all other fungicide treatments except Trivapro and Quadris. For SBS management, only Miravis Neo and the three-way mixture of Echo + Folicur + Topsin were significantly different than the nontreated control. Averaged across all locations, only plots treated with Veltyma fungicide resulted in a significantly greater yield than the nontreated control. The data from the uniform fungicide trial were used to help revise the 2025 edition of the Crop Protection Network Soybean Foliar Fungicide Efficacy Guide. In addition, the data from these trials are being used to test, adjust, and optimize disease prediction models
Spore traps were deployed in soybean fields across eleven different states. Spore samples were collected at two different heights weekly. The samples were sent in bulk to the Smith Laboratory (University of Wisconsin), where DNA currently is being extracted from the 2024 spore samples. For the spore samples collected in 2023, all DNA have been extracted and the Smith Lab and Thomas-Sharma Lab (LSU) are enumerating spores of Cercospora sojina (FLS pathogen) and the species of Cercospora that cause Cercospora leaf blight. The Thomas-Sharma Lab also is developing a molecular assay to enumerate spores of the target spot pathogen (Corynespora cassiicola).
The Smith Lab continues to optimize and validate the “Frogpsotter” app that is used to forecast the risk of frogeye leaf spot A beta version of the app was made available for the 2024 growing season, and a protocol was developed to validate the risk model and evaluate spray thresholds on disease and yield. At several locations, fungicide treatments were applied at different timings based on either growth stage (R3, beginning pod) or a FLS risk threshold of 40%, 50%, and 60% if that risk occurred between R3 to R5. Weekly disease data and yield data were collected across all locations, and currently are being analyzed. The model currently uses a 21-day average of maximum air temperature and 10-day average of total daily hours with max relative humidity > 75% (wetting variable), and daily risk indices are calculated in the tool. The disease data collected from field trials are currently being used to retrain the model, and further field validation will occur during the 2025 growing season.