Updated July 2, 2024:
Determination of Optimum Irrigation Amount and Timing for Enhanced Soybean Yield, Quality, Water Productivity, and Soil Health 2024
(A Technical Report)
PI: Gautam Pradhan, NDSU Williston Research Extension Center
Co-PI: Tyler Tjelde, and James Staricka, NDSU WREC
Research Overview and Objectives
Background
In irrigated agriculture, the amount and timing of irrigation play a crucial role in obtaining a sustainable higher yield with a minimum adverse effect on the environment. Insufficient irrigation results in lesser crop yield than the genetic potentiality of a given variety, while excessive irrigation escalates pumping costs, hastens the depletion of water resources, induces nutrient leaching, and contributes to environmental pollution. Soybean is the second largest irrigated crop in ND preceded by corn. There is a lack of information on the timing and amount of irrigation needed for soybeans under the semiarid conditions of Western ND.
Objectives of the research project
The overall goal of this project is to determine the optimum amount and timing of irrigation for enhanced soybean yield, quality, and water productivity. The secondary objectives are to assess the effect of irrigation treatments on soil health manifested by changes in soil physical and chemical properties, and on the manifestation of soybean diseases including but not limited to white mold.
Materials and Methods
A glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety ND 17009GT was seeded at the Nesson Valley Irrigation Site, Ray, ND (Longitude: -103.1061564, Latitude: 48.1634933) on May 24, 2023, under randomized complete block design with four replications. The seeding rate was 195,000 PLS/ac with row to row distance of 30 in and a gross plot size of 59’ X 50’.
There were 12 irrigation treatments:
1. Full irrigation (I)
2. Deficit irrigation during vegetative stage [(VE – V(n)]
3. Deficit irrigation during flowering stage [R1-R2]
4. Deficit irrigation during pod development stage [R3-R4]
5. Deficit irrigation during seed filling stage [R5-R6]
6. Deficit irrigation during maturity stage [R7-R8]
7. Deficit Irrigation during vegetative + flowering stages
8. Deficit irrigation during vegetative + pod development stages
9. Deficit irrigation during vegetative + seed filling stages
10. Deficit irrigation during vegetative + maturity stages
11. Deficit irrigation during seed filling + maturity stages, and
12. Rainfed (R)
Soil water contents at six different depths (from 6” to 36”) were recorded using a neutron probe. Unmanned aircraft systems equipped with multispectral, thermal, or RGB cameras were flown over the experimental field at different dates to assess canopy temperature (CT), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and normalized difference Red Edge (NDRE).
Research Results/Outcomes
The aerial imagery captured on July 25, 2023, highlighted discernible differences in soybean growth across various treatments. Figure 1 presents representative aerial images depicting four distinct irrigation regimes. Notably, optimal growth was observed under full irrigation (Fig. 1a), with a slight decrease noted under deficit irrigation during the flowering stage (Fig. 1c). Growth was significantly impeded under deficit irrigation during the vegetative stage (Fig 1d), and soybeans subjected to rainfed conditions (Fig. 1b) exhibited a detrimental impact on growth. Figure 2 illustrates the soybean crop as of August 2, 2023, following its complete destruction by a hailstorm on the evening of August 1, 2023.
Figure 1. Aerial image depicting soybean growth under different irrigation regimes. (Aerial imagery captured on July 25, 2023, by Gautam Pradhan): a) Full irrigation; b) Rainfed; c) Deficit irrigation during flowering stage, and d) Deficit irrigation during vegetative stage.
Figure 2. Devastating effect of hailstorm on soybean that occurred on August 1, 2023. (Aerial imagery captured on August 2, 2023, by Gautam Pradhan).
Discussion and Conclusion
The differential impacts of irrigation treatments on soybean growth were evident. However, assessing their impact on grain yield and quality was impeded by hailstorm damage.
View uploaded report
View uploaded report 2
Determination of Optimum Irrigation Amount and Timing for Enhanced Soybean Yield, Quality, Water Productivity, and Soil Health 2024
(Executive Summary)
PI: Gautam Pradhan, NDSU Williston Research Extension Center
Co-PI: Tyler Tjelde, and James Staricka, NDSU WREC
Why the research is important to ND soybean farmers
The research envisages determining the optimum amount and timing of irrigation for soybeans under semiarid conditions. The insights obtained from this research regarding appropriate irrigation amounts and timing will assist soybean producers in western North Dakota in applying the precise amount of water at the right moment. The ultimate advantages will include improved yield, quality, water productivity, and soil health, as well as reduced leaching, environmental pollution, and disease occurrence, leading to increased farm profits.
Research Conducted
Materials and Methods
A glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety ND 17009GT was seeded at the Nesson Valley Irrigation Site, Ray, ND (Longitude: -103.1061564, Latitude: 48.1634933) on May 24, 2023. The seeding rate was 195,000 PLS/ac with Row to Row distance of 30 in and a gross plot size of 59’ X 50’. There were 12 irrigation treatments: (i) Full irrigation, (ii) Deficit irrigation during vegetative stage [(VE – V(n)], (iii) Deficit irrigation during flowering stage [R1-R2] stage, (iv) Deficit irrigation during pod development stage [R3-R4], (v) Deficit irrigation during seed filling stage [R5-R6], (vi) Deficit irrigation during maturity stage [R7-R8], (vii) Deficit Irrigation during vegetative + flowering stages, (viii) Deficit irrigation during vegetative + pod development stages, (ix) Deficit irrigation during vegetative + seed filling stages, (x) Deficit irrigation during vegetative + maturity stages, (xi) Deficit irrigation during seed filling + maturity stages, and (xii) Rainfed (R)
Findings of the research
The aerial imagery captured on July 25, 2023, highlighted discernible differences in soybean growth across various treatments. Notably, optimal growth was observed under full irrigation (Fig. 1a), with a slight decrease noted under deficit irrigation during the flowering stage (Fig. 1c). Growth was significantly impeded under deficit irrigation during the vegetative stage (Fig 1d), and soybeans subjected to rainfed conditions (Fig. 1b) exhibited a detrimental impact on growth. The anticipation to observe the influence of these growth patterns and treatment effects on grain yield and quality was unfortunately disrupted by a hailstorm that occurred on the evening of August 1, 2023, which completely destroyed the entire crop (Fig 2).
Benefits/Recommendations to North Dakota soybean farmers and industry
The hailstorm damage of the entire trial prevented us from noting any project benefits and recommending irrigation technology to North Dakota soybean farmers and industry.
Caption for figures
Figure 1. Representative aerial images depicting soybean growth under different irrigation regimes. (Aerial imagery captured on July 25, 2023, by Gautam Pradhan): a) Full irrigation; b) Rainfed; c) Deficit irrigation during flowering stage, and d) Deficit irrigation during vegetative stage.
Figure 2. Devastating effect of hailstorm on soybean that occurred on August 1, 2023. (Aerial imagery captured on August 2, 2023, by Gautam Pradhan).