Update:
The following progress was made concerning our project objectives:
Objective 1: Studies were established at sites in Snow Hill, MD and Westover, MD, to assess ragweed control in response to cover crop, preplant herbicide application, and residual herbicides at planting. In addition, a supplemental study was established in a conventionally tilled site in Snow Hill, MD, to assess the effects of preplant herbicide application and at planting residual herbicides only. Soybean was planted between May 4 and May 18 at all three sites. Ragweed counts and height measurements were assessed from April 13 through July 12, every 1 to 2 weeks. Preliminary results have not indicated a clear pattern of differences among treatments in ragweed prevalence one month after planting for the various treatments. However, there does seem to be more ragweed following no cover crop than following a cover crop. The supplemental study preliminary results indicate a burndown herbicide that includes residual herbicides has less ragweed 1 month after planting than a burndown herbicide that does not include a residual herbicide.
Objectives 2 and 3: Studies were established in the previously mentioned conventionally tilled site in Snow Hill, MD to assess control of larger common ragweed. Initial herbicide treatments were applied when common ragweed plants reached 6 to 12 inches tall (June 8, 2021). Sequential applications were made 15 days later on June 23, 2021. Common ragweed in plots not previously treated had reached 14 to 18” at the time of the second herbicide application. Common ragweed control was evaluated every 1 to 2 weeks after application until July 12, 2021. Preliminary results indicate that tank mixing or sequential applications are needed when ragweed is sprayed at 6 to 12" tall. However; control was less when ragweed was 14 to 18", even with tank mixes.
In addition, a field-day was held on July 12 at the Snow Hill research site on herbicide resistant weed identification and management. Soybean board funded research and preliminary results were discussed. This event had 21 participants, and 15 received Maryland pesticide license recertification credits at the event.
Update:
The following progress was made concerning our project objectives:
Objective 1: We completed field research at the study site in Snow Hill, MD to assess common ragweed control in response to cover crop, preplant herbicide application, and residual herbicides at planting. Soybean was planted May 4. Ragweed counts and height measurements were assessed from 13 April through 12 July, every 1 to 2 weeks. On 13 April, there was less ragweed where a cover crop was present than no cover crop. On 10 May, following preplant herbicide, there was more ragweed where no cover crop and no preplant herbicide was applied, as compared to where preplant herbicide was applied or where there was a cover crop with no preplant herbicide applied. On 24 May and on 7 July, there was less ragweed where a residual herbicide had been applied than no residual herbicide.
In addition, we completed field research at the supplemental study site in a conventionally tilled field in Snow Hill, MD, to assess the effects of preplant herbicide application and at-planting residual herbicide. There was less common ragweed 27 days after planting following a burndown + residual herbicide than following just a burndown herbicide or no burndown herbicide.
In conclusion, ragweed primarily emerged in May; however, later emerging ragweed was noticed. Delaying cover crop burdown (“planting green”) plus herbicide application at planting that included residuals provided good control of ragweed. There was no advantage of applying preplant + at planting herbicide, when at-planting herbicide included residuals. Following tillage, applying burndown + residual herbicide at planting resulted in less ragweed 1 month after planting than applying herbicide without residual or no herbicide.
Objectives 2 and 3: Studies were established in the previously mentioned conventionally tilled site in Snow Hill, MD to assess control of larger common ragweed. Initial herbicide treatments were applied when common ragweed plants reached 6 to 12 inches tall (June 8, 2021). Sequential applications were made 15 days later on June 23, 2021. Common ragweed in plots not previously treated had reached 14 to 18” at the time of the second herbicide application. Common ragweed control was evaluated every 1 to 2 weeks after application until July 12, 2021. Results indicate that tank mixing or sequential applications are needed when ragweed is sprayed at 6 to 12" tall. However, control was less when ragweed was 14 to 18", even with tank mixes.
A field-day was held on July 12 at the Snow Hill research site on herbicide resistant weed identification and management. Soybean board funded research and preliminary results were discussed. This event had 21 participants, and 15 received Maryland pesticide license recertification credits at the event. Results from this year's project were published in University of Maryland’s Agronomy News and presented at the Maryland Soybean Board Checkoff research field day. Results are also being presented at winter agronomy meetings. Information from this project has reached over 200 people so far.