2016
Utilizing Soybean Maturity Class and Planting Date Evaluation to Improve Soybean Production in West and Central ND
Contributor/Checkoff:
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Field management Nutrient managementSoil healthTillageYield trials
Parent Project:
This is the first year of this project.
Lead Principal Investigator:
Jasper M. Teboh, North Dakota State University, Carrington Research Extension Center
Co-Principal Investigators:
John Rickertsen, North Dakota State University- Hettinger Research Extension Center
Szilvia Zilahi-Sebess, North Dakota State University, Carrington Research Extension Center
+1 More
Project Code:
Brief Project Summary:

Soybean production in North Dakota (ND) has steadily grown with a record 6 million acres planted in 2014. There is increasing interest in growing soybeans west of the Missouri River. Soybean production would give producers in western North Dakota another crop to diversify their rotations and another option for a later planted crop when wet conditions have not permitted timely small grain planting. There has been very little research done to assess the performance of soybeans in western ND and a great need for information on the best maturity and planting dates for the semi-arid part of the state. It is therefore imperative that research be done to assess the performance of soybeans...

Unique Keywords:
#crop management systems
Information And Results
Project Deliverables

This research will be one of a few of any recent trials to provide soybean yield response as a function of maturity class and planting date across environments with a goal to expand production across the West. We will determine whether farmers can plant much earlier than has been traditionally practiced across these environments and if they can still make profits by planting late much earlier or later. If farmers can plant soybeans later than usual and still able to break even in years when planting delays were a challenge, that gives them some flexibility in their farm management decision making. Farmers will also be provided with updated information on how different maturity date varieties can affect final yields. Yield data collected will be correlated with rainfall data and frost events to show to what extent planting date and maturity class interacts with climate to produce observed yields.
These data will be presented in final year reports including an economic analysis to determine profitability and possibilities in the West. Farmers would have access to new information from which to prioritize warm season crop planting decisions and to prevent leaving fields unplanted, which is detrimental to soil microorganism population and soil health. And finally, more producers would be encouraged to grow soybeans.

Final Project Results

Updated December 2, 2016:
Final Progress Report is downloaded in the File (optional) below

View uploaded report Word file

Title: Utilizing soybean maturity class and planting date evaluation to improve soybean production in West and Central ND.

Principal Investigator: Jasper M Teboh, NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center;
Co-Principal Investigators: John Rickertsen, NDSU Hettinger Research Extension Center; Szilvia Zilahi-Sebess, NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

Executive summary_________________________________________________
Producers and stakeholders have interest in expanding soybean production and productivity beyond Central ND, to non-traditional production areas, west of the Missouri River. Dry summers with low available moisture at critical growth stages, and short growing cycle are some of the limiting factors. The goal of this project is to enhance the farmer’s understanding of how maturity classes/groups (MG) and planting dates may be used to minimize soybean production risks. This research was conducted to determine optimum yielding maturity classes of soybean under dryland conditions in Western ND, and under irrigation in Central ND, to determine if early or late planting has any significant impact on soybeans.

Field trials were conducted in Hettinger (HREC), where irrigated soybean from three MG was established under rain-fed conditions, and in Carrington (CREC), where four MG were grown under irrigation. Seeds were planted at four planting dates from May 5th (early planting) to June 9th (late planting). The soybean MG were, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 at both sites, including 0.7 at CREC. Maturity groups 0.2 to 0.4 would be considered early at HREC, while they are generally considered suitable at CREC. Each planting date was about one week from the previous date at HREC, and varied between 10 days and 2 weeks from the previous date at Carrington. Maturity groups 0.2, and 0.6 were RoundUp Ready varieties, while 0.4 and 0.7 were conventional varieties.

Average yield at the HREC was 31 bu compared to 41 bu/a at CREC. At HREC, yields were significantly greater for MG 0.6 and 0.2, than MG 0.4 when averaged across planting dates. This suggests that yield differences among MG may be due to influences from some other factors, besides being an early or a late variety. It must be noted that the 0.2 and 0.6 varieties were both RoundUp Ready varieties, and the other(s) conventional. Protein followed similar trend as yields, while oil was lower for any MG with a higher yield. Planting on May 19th produced the highest yields (averaged at 35 bu/a), followed by May 27th (31 bu/ac). Yield differences for MG 0.6 showed more stability showing less differences between planting dates. Despite yield dependency of early MG on planting date, this was not consistent. Overall, later maturing varieties had better yields. At CREC, yield differences were not significant. Average yields varied between 44 bu (MG 0.7) and 41 bu/a (MG 0.4) at this irrigation site. Planting on June 1st gave the highest yield, even though yields and protein were not significantly different. Results in 2015 indicated that early planting can produce similar yields as a later planting date, depending on the maturity group used.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.