2013
Influence of farming system contribution to best management practices for improving soybean grain yield, soil carbon levels, pest management control and profitability
Category:
Sustainable Production
Keywords:
Field management Nutrient managementSoil healthTillageYield trials
Lead Principal Investigator:
Howard Woodard, South Dakota State University
Co-Principal Investigators:
Anthony Bly, South Dakota State University
Ron Gelderman, South Dakota State University
Allen Heuer, South Dakota State University
Carol Johnston, South Dakota State University
Michael Moechnig, South Dakota State University
Cuirong Ren, South Dakota State University
Peter Sexton, South Dakota State University
Jerry Warmann, South Dakota State University
+7 More
Project Code:
Contributing Organization (Checkoff):
Institution Funded:
Brief Project Summary:

Three sites will be selected across eastern South Dakota to measure soybean yield response, carbon storage, pest control and economic benefits of various farming systems in a five-year study. Farming system combinations will compare tillage vs. no-till systems, along with residue removal vs. residue retained systems and all combinations of these two main effects. Soil testing will measure long-term changes in soil carbon storage and rates of nutrient depletion in various system combinations. Grain yields will demonstrate the effectiveness of maintaining economic yields despite some aspects of the main treatments which may reduce yields at the expense of increasing soil carbon.

Unique Keywords:
#best management practices, #carbon sequestration, #crop management systems, #soybean production management
Information And Results
Project Deliverables

Growing Season Sites
Three sites were prepared and planted in eastern South Dakota at locations on the Northeast Research Farm west of South Shore, SD, the Volga Research Farm in western Brookings county SD, and the Southeast Research Farm in Beresford, SD. These sites were selected because of the availability of SDSU technicians and equipment. The locations were also important for comparisons because they experience roughly a range in similar annual moisture (differing by about 3.5"/annum) while differing significantly in the amount of Growing Degree Days (GDD) measured (2300 - 3000 GDD oF). The sites were flagged for each treatment plot strips (200’ long and 30’ wide) with alleyways between replications where appropriate. Corn stover was raked and baled on selected corn plots with commercial raking and baling equipment, weighed and then sampled for future nutrient analysis. The average stover removed ranged from about 25% (Northeast Research Farm) to 85% (Volga and Southeast research Farms. Tillage was applied the previous Fall (chisel plow) and following Spring (field cultivator) before planting. At physiological maturity, grain yields were harvested with a commercial combine and raw yield weights from the plots determined by a combine load cell. Grain yields were estimated on an acre basis after grain moisture was considered for each treatment. A small plot area of soybean residue was weighed for estimation of residue weight. Subsamples of the crop residue were harvested for future nutrient content analysis. Grain yields at the research sites were adversely affected by the severe drought which gripped the north- central region of the U.S. Grain yield harvested, were the lowest recorded in several decades. Comparisons between tillage and residue management were not appropriate because of the low yield potential, so only ranges were reported.

Climatic Influences
May and June air temperatures were above normal and precipitation was below normal. Air temperatures were well above normal for the remainder of

Final Project Results

During a normal yield year which 2012 was not, information derived from best management practices may provide new insights into specific goals (either for soil C storage, grain yield or stover production). It is anticipated that two recommendations will be made for the best economic yield package of production treatments. In addition, a decision tree for soil C storage to obtain the most favorable scenarios for 'carbon credits' should be forthcoming. This carbon credit may offset any possible yield disadvantages.

An additional benefit of this research would identify those combinations of production practices which enhance the recycling of nutrients contained in crop residues in order to trim fertilizer costs when their cost is high.

The United Soybean Research Retention policy will display final reports with the project once completed but working files will be purged after three years. And financial information after seven years. All pertinent information is in the final report or if you want more information, please contact the project lead at your state soybean organization or principal investigator listed on the project.